Skip to main content

Test Monitoring and Continuous Verification

Maintain continuous compliance through ongoing test monitoring, proactive alerts, and systematic verification of control effectiveness.

John Ozdemir avatar
Written by John Ozdemir
Updated over a month ago

Continuous Monitoring Model

Traditional compliance relies on point-in-time checks before audits. DSALTA enables continuous monitoring:

Automated Tests: Run on regular schedules without manual intervention

Immediate Alerts: Notify when controls fail or drift from compliance

Historical Tracking: Show sustained compliance over time

Proactive Remediation: Fix issues as they arise, not months later

This shift from reactive to proactive compliance reduces audit stress and improves actual security.

Test Monitoring Dashboard

Access monitoring overview from Compliance > Tests:

Overall Pass Rate: Percentage of tests currently passing

Tests by Status: Count of passing, failing, and attention-needed tests

Recent Failures: Latest tests that moved from passing to failing

Trending: Controls improving or degrading over time

Test Frequencies

Different controls require different monitoring cadences:

Continuous/Hourly: Critical security controls (encryption, authentication)

Daily: Important operations (logging, backups, monitoring)

Weekly: Regular compliance checks (access permissions, configurations)

Monthly/Quarterly: Periodic reviews (access audits, vendor assessments)

DSALTA automatically schedules tests at appropriate frequencies based on control risk levels.

Alert Configuration

Configure notifications for test-related events:

Critical Failures: Immediate alerts for high-risk control failures

Status Changes: Notify when passing tests start failing

Manual Test Reminders: Alerts when periodic tests are due

Integration Issues: Warnings when connections prevent monitoring

Set alert preferences in account settings or per-test configurations.

Monitoring by Framework

View test status for specific frameworks:

Filter tests by SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other active certifications to see framework-specific compliance status.

This helps prioritize remediation based on upcoming audits or customer requirements.

Test Performance Metrics

Track key metrics for program improvement:

Mean Time to Detect (MTTD): How quickly failures are identified

Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR): How quickly issues are resolved

Test Coverage: Percentage of controls with active tests

Recurring Failures: Tests that fail repeatedly

False Positive Rate: Tests producing incorrect failures

Use these metrics to optimize your compliance program.

Integration Health Monitoring

Automated tests depend on healthy integrations:

Connection Status: Is integration active and authorized?

Last Sync: When did integration last collect data?

Error Rate: Are API calls succeeding?

Data Quality: Is the collected information complete?

Monitor integration health from the

Integrations page. Address connectivity issues immediately to maintain test coverage.

Responding to Test Drift

Controls can drift from compliance due to:

Configuration changes without compliance review

System updates are changing the default settings

Personnel changes affecting access or training

Process evolution without updating procedures

Continuous monitoring catches drift immediately rather than discovering it months later during audits.

Test Coverage Analysis

Ensure comprehensive monitoring:

Controls with Tests: Automated or manual verification in place

Controls without Tests: Gaps requiring attention

Test-to-Control Ratio: How many tests verify each control

Framework Coverage: Test coverage by certification

Identify and address monitoring gaps before audits.

Historical Test Data

DSALTA maintains a complete test history:

Trend Analysis: View pass rates over weeks and months

Pattern Recognition: Identify recurring issues or seasonal variations

Audit Evidence: Demonstrate sustained compliance, not just current status

Improvement Tracking: Show how the program matures over time

Historical data is crucial for Type II audits requiring evidence of continuous monitoring.

Manual Test Tracking

For tests requiring human verification:

Scheduled Tests: Calendar of upcoming manual verifications

Overdue Tests: Tests past their execution date

Completion Rate: Percentage of manual tests completed on time

Owner Performance: Track individual completion rates

Set reminders and monitor completion to ensure manual tests don't fall behind.

Maintaining Audit Readiness

Continuous monitoring enables perpetual audit readiness:

Always Current: Evidence is never more than hours old

No Scrambling: No last-minute evidence collection before audits

Confidence: Real-time visibility into compliance status

Historical Proof: Trend data proves sustained, not temporary, compliance

Test Optimization

Use monitoring data to improve efficiency:

High-Failure Tests: May need better implementation or testing logic

Never-Failing Tests: Consider reducing frequency

Redundant Tests: Multiple tests checking the same thing

Missing Coverage: Controls without adequate testing

Regular optimization maintains effective monitoring without unnecessary overhead.

Did this answer your question?