Skip to main content

Mapping Documents to Controls and Frameworks

Link documents to controls and frameworks to create organized evidence trails that streamline audits and demonstrate compliance.

John Ozdemir avatar
Written by John Ozdemir
Updated over 2 months ago

Connecting documents to controls and frameworks transforms scattered files into structured compliance evidence. Proper mapping makes audits efficient and demonstrates systematic compliance management.

Why Document Mapping Matters

Mapping provides:

  • Quick evidence retrieval during audits

  • Clear traceability from control to proof

  • Automated evidence organization by framework

  • Confidence that all controls have supporting documentation

  • Reduced audit preparation time

Without mapping, documents are just files in storage. With mapping, they become structured compliance evidence.

How Mapping Works

Each document can link to:

  • Controls: Specific security requirements the document supports

  • Frameworks: Compliance standards the document addresses

  • Policies: Related policy documents

When you link a document to a control, it automatically associates with all frameworks that control serves.

[Screenshot needed: Document detail showing mapped controls and frameworks]

Linking Documents to Controls

From the Document

  1. Open the document detail page

  2. Navigate to the Mapped Elements or Controls tab

  3. Click Link Control or Add Control

  4. Search and select relevant controls

  5. Save

From the Control

  1. Open the control detail page

  2. Go to the Documents tab

  3. Click Add Document

  4. Select from existing documents or upload new

  5. Save

Either approach creates the same linkage.

Common Document-to-Control Mappings

Access Control Documents:

  • User directory exports → Access management controls

  • MFA enrollment reports → Authentication controls

  • Access review sign-offs → Periodic review controls

Security Assessment Documents:

  • Penetration test reports → Vulnerability management, secure development

  • Vendor security reviews → Vendor risk management

  • Risk assessments → Risk management controls

Operational Documents:

  • Incident response reports → Incident management controls

  • Change logs → Change management controls

  • Backup verification → Business continuity controls

Contractual Documents:

  • Business Associate Agreements → Vendor controls, privacy controls

  • Data Processing Agreements → Data protection controls

  • Customer security agreements → Multiple controls depending on requirements

One Document, Multiple Controls

Many documents support multiple controls:

Example: Penetration Test Report

  • Vulnerability management control

  • Secure development control

  • Network security control

  • Configuration management control

Link it once to all applicable controls. The document appears in each control's evidence.

Framework-Level Mapping

Some documents support entire frameworks rather than specific controls:

  • Organizational charts

  • Security program overviews

  • Executive security presentations

  • Compliance roadmaps

These can be associated directly with frameworks without control-level mapping.

Evidence Gaps and Coverage

DSALTA highlights controls lacking document evidence:

Controls with Evidence: Show linked documents count Controls Needing Evidence: Flagged for attention Framework Coverage: Percentage of controls with sufficient documentation

Use these indicators to prioritize document collection and mapping.

[Screenshot needed: Control showing evidence count or gap indicator]

Automated vs. Manual Evidence

Distinguish between evidence types:

Automated Evidence: Collected from integrations

  • Continuously updated

  • Always current

  • Linked automatically to relevant controls

Manual Evidence: Uploaded documents

  • Requires periodic updates

  • Needs explicit mapping

  • Provides context automation can't capture

Both types appear together in control evidence views.

Document Mapping for Audits

During audits, auditors request evidence by control. Well-mapped documents enable:

Quick Response: "Show me evidence for CC6.7" → Instantly pull all linked documents Complete Packages: Generate framework-specific evidence packages automatically Audit Trail: Demonstrate systematic evidence management Confidence: Know you have evidence before auditors ask

Organizing Multi-Framework Evidence

When managing multiple certifications:

Shared Evidence: Document linked to control serving SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR Framework-Specific: Some documents only relevant to one framework Inheritance: Control mapping automatically creates framework associations

This efficient reuse means less total documentation for multiple certifications.

Best Practices

Map During Upload: Link documents to controls immediately, not later Regular Reviews: Verify mappings remain accurate as controls evolve Complete Coverage: Ensure every control has appropriate evidence Quality Over Quantity: One excellent document beats multiple mediocre ones Keep Current: Update or replace documents as they age

Using Document Maps for Planning

Document mapping reveals:

  • Which controls are well-documented

  • Which need more evidence

  • Where evidence is aging and needs refresh

  • What documentation to prioritize

Use these insights to plan evidence collection efforts efficiently.

Next Steps

To create effective document mappings:

  1. Review controls for your active frameworks

  2. Identify which controls lack sufficient documentation

  3. Upload and map priority documents first

  4. Set reminders to update mapped documents periodically

  5. Verify mappings before audit preparations begin

Well-mapped documents transform compliance from reactive to proactive.

Did this answer your question?